The purpose of this section is intended to allow for the political discussions that the FOCM political chapter has previously conducted via email. A password is required so that only those who know what this group is like can access it. We have had rather heated discussions in the past and only the strong and brave should participate. As moderator of this section, I reserve the right to censor inappropriate remarks and admit or remove participants. If you would like to observe or participate, just use the contact form to email me your request for the password.
I had the same realization recently in regards to a pair of Levi Original Shrink to Fit 501 jeans. I bought a pair last year and realizing that I still wear a pair of black pre-shrunk 501’s which I first got in around 1993 (when the company I worked for had just started casual attire Fridays), this pair of jeans could be the last pair I need to buy. These pants may see me out.
It might seem a bit morbid to think about that. The more I think about it in my stream of consciousness blogging – Levi 501’s tell a part of my life story. When I find something that works for me, I stick with it. It makes decision making easier. My youngest daughter when in elementary school put together a book entitled: “My Dad”. One one page was a drawing of a man in blue pants with the sentence, “my dad’s favorite pants are jeans.”
Rachel, my hair cutting professional (her business is on the “recommended” tab at this web site), said that it’s a rather amazing thing that I can still fit into jeans that I have had for 25 years. A few years ago I did have to go up an inch in the waist. Growing up when there wasn’t pre-shrunk jeans, you came to know that Levi 501’s shrink 3 inches in the length and 1 inch in the waist. So for a long time I bought 32 waist, 33 length. So when pre-shrunk jeans came out, I knew I needed 31 waist, 30 length. I just counted, I have 10 pair of jeans, three of them are probably 25-30 years old, two of them have ripped at the knee due to natural causes, not artificially done to be stylistic. I had to go up to 33 waist and then 34 waist, 33 length and have 3 pair at that size. The last pair I bought were back down to 33 waist, 32 length (aging bones are reducing my height). So as I type this, a few pair are bound to become unwearable and will be taken out of circulation (yes, I rotate my jeans, so they each get their turn) and discarded. I don’t know if a pair can make it 40 years. So I bet I will need to buy one more pair in 2020 and that pair will be the ones to see me out.
After my Mom’s passing in October 2017, we found letters she had written to her parents while she was away at college. She spent one year attending Arizona State College at Tempe (now Arizona State University). She was there in 1948, during the Presidential election between Thomas Dewey and Harry Truman. It was interesting to read her comments and to find they don’t sound much different than today.
In late September of that year, she and her Aunt “went into Phoenix to hear Dewey”. She wrote this: “Daddy, I’m sure you would have liked the part about free enterprise and little government regulation of business.” (My grandfather worked automobile parts industry.) Dewey was the Republican candidate. To this day, Republican candidates still run on easing government regulation of business and letting free enterprise reward companies that make and deliver what people want while making a profit and weeding out those that don’t.
She also wrote, “He sounds as tho he’ll clean up Washington & make things efficient.” We certainly hear this comment from Presidential candidates every four years.
It seems a fairly uniform response from my friends that the recent new company names: IQVIA (Quintiles – IMS’ new name) and Syneos (INC – Inventiv’s new name) aren’t being received well. They come across awkwardly and while I’ve not heard the rationale for Syneos (i imagine something to do with synergy), the IQVIA rationale has been explained. Unfortunately, while most people understand the idea, the name and whether it’s pronounced IQ-veye-uh or IQ-vee-uh it still isn’t considered compelling. And as we all know, some marketing ad agencies got a lot of money for these names.
So the other day, my domestic partner came up with these bad company names all based on trying to say: “we deliver on promises”:
What other names can we come up with? I bet an FOCM e-brainstorming session could have done better.
How about a company name for “we tell the truth in advance” or “vaporware is our best seller”?
At the recommendation of Jack Minster (or maybe he actually ordered it for me), I read a book called Jerusalem by Simon Sebag Montefiore. What an amazing history that town has seen. The book covers the history of the town from roughly 2000 BC to current day. I highly recommend it for any person who likes World history.
One thing stood out to me, in line with the subject of this blog – happened in 1855-1860. An Italian man named Moses Montefiore, later knighted by Queen Victoria for his service as Sheriff of London and in recognition of his services to humanitarian causes on behalf of the Jewish people. He followed the Jewish religion and after visiting Jersualem in 1827 he became a more devoted observer of his religion.
In 1854 his friend Judah Touro, a wealthy American Jew, died having bequeathed money to fund a Jewish residential settlement in Palestine. Montefiore was appointed executor of his will, and used the funds for a variety of projects aimed at encouraging the Jews to engage in productive labor. In 1855, he purchased an orchard on the outskirts of Jaffa that offered agricultural training people.
In 1860, he built the first Jewish residential settlement outside the walls of Jerusalem. Living outside the city walls was dangerous at the time, due to lawlessness and bandits. Montefiore offered financial inducement to encourage poor families to move there. Montefiore donated large sums of money to promote industry, education and health amongst the Jewish community in Palestine.
His life’s mission of helping Jersualem’s Jewish people caused him to give so much money that many people became dependent on his charity and that was their sole means of support. When he tried to wean them off of his handouts, they rioted in his camp.
This is certainly been repeated in countries around the world. When people get used to receiving support with little or no contribution put forth to earn it, upon the support being reduced, the response too often is to scream and shout and demand it not stop. This is becoming a problem in Saudi Arabia as unemployment is so high, it costs the government a lot to keep the people complacent by giving out so much money.
I think history shows that the best solution is democracy and capitalism where hard work and effort are rewarded.
it hit me today while talking to members of my family – just how crazily hypersensitive the world, or at least America is becoming over potential slights masquerading as extreme assaults.
While reviewing some to-do lists with my family, I said, “well thank goodness I’m here serving as task master – OOPS!! – I don’t think the word ‘master’ can be used any more because it conjures up the past when there were slaveholders, known as masters, and slaves.”
So I then said, “maybe I should be called the task manager”, OOPS!! i can’t say manager as that could be considered sexist, so perhaps we need a new word ‘personager’ to replace manager. I guess i’m the taskminder, that seems to be a safe word and shouldn’t upset anyone, right? I sure hope that’s okay, but please tell me if that upsets someone.
So blatant, it’s almost comical. Maybe I am wrong but isn’t the biggest part of the story the indictment of Manafort – severity of the crimes, his name recognition, etc. However CNN chose to open with an unheard of guy who plead guilty to lying to the FBI. They finally get to Manafort in paragraph 3 starting with “in addition”.
Below are the first paragraphs of CNN’s report on the Special Counsel indictments released today (bolding is mine):
Washington (CNN)A former Trump campaign foreign policy adviser has pleaded guilty to making a false statement to the FBI after he lied about his interactions with foreign officials close to the Russian government, the campaign’s clearest connection so far to Russia’s efforts to meddle in the 2016 election.
In court records unsealed on Monday, the FBI said George Papadopoulos “falsely described his interactions with a certain foreign contact who discussed ‘dirt’ related to emails” concerning Hillary Clinton. Records also describe an email between Trump campaign officials suggesting they were considering acting on Russian invitations to go to Russia.
In addition, former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort and former Trump campaign official Rick Gates surrendered Monday to Justice Department special counsel Robert Mueller.
The charges against top officials from Trump’s campaign signals a dramatic new phase of Mueller’s wide-ranging investigation into possible collusion between the Russian government and members of Trump’s team as well as potential obstruction of justice and financial crimes.
Papadopoulos’ guilty plea brings the Mueller probe into actions that occurred during the 2016 campaign. The charges against Manafort and Gates are unrelated to the Trump campaign, though it’s possible Mueller could add additional charges.
and the NY Times headline at least has Manafort in the title, throws in a Trump reference but ends with the no-name admitting to lying. But at least they spent the first 5 paragraphs on the indictment against Manafort.
NY Times headline:
Paul Manafort, Once of Trump Campaign, Indicted as an Adviser Admits to Lying About Ties to Russia
Chuck Schumer on the record being opposed to illegal immigration. He stated in 2009:
During a speech at the Immigration Law & Policy Conference at Georgetown Law, Schumer repeatedly argued that immigration reform should focus on encouraging legal immigration and should make clear that “illegal immigration is wrong.”
“The American people are fundamentally pro-legal immigration and anti-illegal immigration,” Schumer explained at the conference. “We will only pass comprehensive reform when we recognize this fundamental concept.”
The thought police are here. Witness this article by John Stossel.
A rather crazy exchange he had with Gloria Steinem years ago:
Feminist icon Gloria Steinem said gender differences shouldn’t even be researched. She told me it’s “anti-American, crazy thinking.”
“Aren’t women, in general, better nurturers?” I asked.
“No,” answered Steinem. “Next question.”
At the time, fire departments had just dropped strength tests to help female applicants. One critic of the change complained that instead of being carried out during a fire, now she would be dragged downstairs, her head hitting each stair. Steinem responded, “It’s better to drag them out … (L)ess smoke down there.”